As an incident handler, have you wondered whether the way how you deal with a cybersecurity incident can be improved, how others deal with the same issues, whether the handling can be automatized? If yes, you are not alone. There is a whole community working on a standard to express incident response playbooks and SAPPAN contributes to the effort.
From what I had the opportunity to observe, incident handling is in a majority a repetitive work. A reaction to a large portion of incidents is the same. I mean the reaction vary, based on the incident, but similar incidents happen again and again and the reaction to a similar incident follows the same pattern.
Now imagine similar incidents happen all over the world constantly. Wouldn’t it be great if these “boring” incidents were not handled individually and manually? I wish there was a pool of knowledge on how to react to these incidents. Then the pieces of such knowledge can be shared, with some customization, deployed in the infrastructure and automatically executed.
The representation of incident handling is the key enabler to sharing. Since recently, I have not come across any standard to represent incident handling procedures. Organizations use either high-level playbooks which are human readable (e.g. Figure 1) but not machine readable, or scripts which are machine readable but not interoperable across organizations nor shareable and hard to understand by a human. I was simply missing a standard that would fit both worlds – human readable but with a structure that would allow for transforming the playbook into the instructions for a machine.
The SAPPAN project sets one of its goals to share incident handling information. While I was working on this goal, I came across the standardization effort organized within OASIS – Collaborative Automated Course of Action Operations for Cyber Security Technical Committee . This is exactly what I was looking for, I said to myself when I first read the draft of the standard. Since I work with MISP (Malware Incident Sharing Platform ) as the main sharing platform, I decided to prepare a MISP data model for the CACAO playbooks. I got in touch with the committee, and we thoroughly discussed various alternatives how to best model the CACAO playbooks in MISP.
In the end, we decided to take a straight-forward approach and prepared a MISP playbook object with specific attributes only for the playbook metadata. The whole CACAO playbook is stored as an attachment attribute in the object. This allows to share also other playbook formats and does not require the transformation of the playbooks when it is shared and exported. Also, we discussed the playbook object with the MISP developers, and I am happy to announce it is now available in the official MISP object repository  so that we can start to test its interoperability with other partners.
I am looking forward to the growth of the playbook sharing community, be it either publicly available or shared only within the closed communities of cybersecurity intelligence vendors and their customers.
 OASIS Collaborative Automated Course of Action Operations (CACAO) for Cyber Security TC. CACAO Security playbooks specification v1.0, available online: https://docs.oasis-open.org/cacao/security-playbooks/v1.0/cs01/security-playbooks-v1.0-cs01.html
 MISP – Open Source Threat Intelligence Platform & Open Standards For Threat Information Sharing, available online: https://www.misp-project.org
 MISP repository, available online: https://github.com/MISP/misp-objects/pull/324#issue-1009464958